![]() With this option checked, you can switch RapidWeaver into Preview Mode and view the CSS, HTML and Javascript code required to generate your button. To other come this limitation, BackToTop has a special checkbox option marked View Generated Source Code. Ordinarily it will not work in other webpages, like the Blog, Photo Album, Markdown, Styled Text or a RapidWeaver Contact Form. Using BackToTop in other page typesBackToTop is a stack element, and therefore only works in a Stacks page type. For example, if you are using a ThemeFlood theme that includes a newer version of Font Awesome Icons, you can adjust the icon markup accordingly. If you want to change the icon used to something else, then replace the existing Icon Content of with your preferred icon markup. You can find the Font Awesome 4.7 reference guide here: As of Stacks version 4 and less, the Stacks plugin uses Font Awesome Icons version 4.7. These tooltips provide information about what each setting does.įont Awesome IconsBy default, BackToTop stack uses Font Awesome Icons. Like most stacks, all the settings have information tooltips, when you mouseover them. ![]() Preview your webpage to see the finished result.Design the button to any shape, size, position of colour you want, using the provided settings.With the BackToTop stack selected in edit mode, you can access all of its settings in the Stacks side panel.Drag and drop a copy of BackToTop into the webpage.Install the stack into Stacks and RapidWeaver, in the normal way.SetupFollow these instructions for using BackToTop. BackToTop stacks are automatically hidden if the webpage is printed or saved as a PDF. You will see a black button appear towards the bottom right of the screen. this whole arena is open to development I guess then.ExampleWhen you scroll this webpage down. Yet RW has no true adversary so I guess one cannot really complain. Not sure it is a YourHead issue, all this may stem frm the way RW is built. All in all RW and all its plugins are very cute but the whole deal feels a bit childish for lack of a better word. so a "lock block position" seems mandatory as far as I'm concerned. sure a little undo will put them back where they were but till I find this aggravating. when all you wanted to do was edit their content you move the blocks themselves almsot every single time. The blocks cannot be locked while working so any "wrong" mouse movement moves them. ![]() namely Safari on OSX and Explorer on Windows. and the blocks end up not appearing similar in different browsers. You've got to give more space on the sides of the blocks to make sure you are not missing content. basically what you see is not what you get. blocks eat up part of their content if you trust the wysiwyg setup view. Ok sure it adds a very useful functionality.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |